Using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure

ABSTRACT

A meter electronics ( 20 ) for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure is provided. The meter electronics ( 20 ) includes a processing system ( 200 ) communicatively coupled to a meter assembly ( 10 ) having the fluid, the processing system ( 200 ) is configured to determine a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in the meter assembly ( 10 ), measure a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly ( 10 ), derive a vapor pressure from the measured density, and compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The embodiments described below relate to determining a vapor pressure and, more particularly, using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure.

BACKGROUND

Vibrating sensors, such as for example, vibrating densitometers and Coriolis flowmeters are generally known, and are used to measure mass flow and other information for materials flowing through a conduit in the flowmeter. Exemplary Coriolis flowmeters are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,109,524, 4,491,025, and Re. 31,450, all to J. E. Smith et al. These flowmeters have one or more conduits of a straight or curved configuration. Each conduit configuration in a Coriolis mass flowmeter, for example, has a set of natural vibration modes, which may be of simple bending, torsional, or coupled type. Each conduit can be driven to oscillate at a preferred mode.

Material flows into the flowmeter from a connected pipeline on the inlet side of the flowmeter, is directed through the conduit(s), and exits the flowmeter through the outlet side of the flowmeter. The natural vibration modes of the vibrating system are defined in part by the combined mass of the conduits and the material flowing within the conduits.

When there is no-flow through the flowmeter, a driving force applied to the conduit(s) causes all points along the conduit(s) to oscillate with identical phase or a small “zero offset”, which is a time delay measured at zero flow. As material begins to flow through the flowmeter, Coriolis forces cause each point along the conduit(s) to have a different phase. For example, the phase at the inlet end of the flowmeter lags the phase at the centralized driver position, while the phase at the outlet leads the phase at the centralized driver position. Pickoffs on the conduit(s) produce sinusoidal signals representative of the motion of the conduit(s). Signals output from the pickoffs are processed to determine the time delay between the pickoffs. The time delay between the two or more pickoffs is proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through the conduit(s).

Meter electronics connected to the driver generate a drive signal to operate the driver and determine a mass flow rate and other properties of a material from signals received from the pickoffs. The driver may comprise one of many well-known arrangements; however, a magnet and an opposing drive coil have received great success in the flowmeter industry. An alternating current is passed to the drive coil for vibrating the conduit(s) at a desired flow tube amplitude and frequency. It is also known in the art to provide the pickoffs as a magnet and coil arrangement very similar to the driver arrangement. However, while the driver receives a current which induces a motion, the pickoffs can use the motion provided by the driver to induce a voltage.

Vapor pressure is an important property in applications which handle flow and storage of volatile fluids such as gasoline, natural gas liquids, and liquid petroleum gas. Vapor pressure provides an indication of how volatile fluids may perform during handling, and further indicates conditions under which bubbles will likely form and pressure will likely build. As such, vapor pressure measurement of volatile fluids increases safety and prevents damage to transport vessels and infrastructure. For example, if the vapor pressure of a fluid is too high, cavitation during pumping and transfer operations may occur. Furthermore, vessel or process line vapor pressure may potentially rise beyond safe levels due to temperature changes. It is therefore often required that vapor pressure be known prior to storage and transport.

Typically, a vapor pressure is determined by capturing samples and removing them to a laboratory for testing to determine the value from the sample. This poses difficult issues for regulatory fuel quality standards enforcement because of the delay in obtaining final results, the cost of maintaining a lab, and the safety and legal evidence vulnerabilities associated with sample handling. A need therefore exists for an in-line device or system that can determine a vapor pressure of a fluid in a meter assembly on a continuous, real-time, basis under process conditions. This is provided by the present embodiments, and an advance in the art is achieved. On-site measurement is more reliable, as it obviates the need for the periodic sampling and fully eliminates the risk of fluid property changes between the time of sample collection and laboratory assay. Furthermore, safety is improved by having real-time measurements, as unsafe conditions may be remedied immediately. Additionally, money is saved, as regulatory enforcement may be conducted via simple on-site checks, wherein inspection and enforcement decisions may be made with little delay or process cessation. These benefits may be enhanced by verifying a vapor pressure measurement.

SUMMARY

A meter electronics for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure is provided. According to an embodiment, the meter electronics comprises a processing system communicatively coupled to a meter assembly having the fluid. The processing system is configured to determine a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in the meter assembly, measure a density of the fluid based on the resonant frequency of the meter assembly, derive a vapor pressure from the measured density, and compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

A method for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure is provided. According to an embodiment, the method comprises determining a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in a meter assembly, measuring a density of the fluid based on the resonant frequency of the meter assembly, deriving a vapor pressure from the measured density, and comparing the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

ASPECTS

According to an aspect, a meter electronics (20) for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure comprises a processing system (200) communicatively coupled to a meter assembly (10) having the fluid. The processing system (200) is configured to determine a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in the meter assembly (10), measure a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly (10), derive a vapor pressure from the measured density, and compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

Preferably, the fluid is a multi-component fluid comprised of hydrocarbon components.

Preferably, hydrocarbon components are comprised of at least two of propane, butane, and hexane.

Preferably, the processing system (200) being configured to derive the vapor pressure from the measured density comprises the processing system (200) being configured to utilize previously determined correlations between a plurality of vapor pressures and a plurality of densities.

Preferably, the processing system (200) being configured to utilize previously the determined correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the plurality of the densities comprises the processing system (200) being configured to interpolate between the previously determined correlations.

Preferably, the processing system (200) being configured to compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure comprises the processing system (200) being configured to determine if the determined vapor pressure is within a predetermined range of the derived vapor pressure.

Preferably, the processing system (200) is further configured to determine the vapor pressure using a drive gain.

According to an aspect, a method for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure comprises determining a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in a meter assembly, measuring a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly, deriving a vapor pressure from the measured density, and comparing the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

Preferably, the fluid is a multi-component fluid comprised of hydrocarbon components.

Preferably, the hydrocarbon components are comprised of at least two of propane, butane, and hexane.

Preferably, deriving the vapor pressure from the measured density comprises utilizing previously determined correlations between a plurality of vapor pressures and a plurality of densities.

Preferably, utilizing previously the determined correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the plurality of the densities comprises interpolating between the previously determined correlations.

Preferably, comparing the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure comprises determining if the determined vapor pressure is within a predetermined range of the derived vapor pressure.

Preferably, the method further comprises determining the vapor pressure using a drive gain.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The same reference number represents the same element on all drawings. It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale.

FIG. 1 shows a vibratory meter 5.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the meter electronics 20 of vibratory meter 5.

FIG. 3 shows a graph 300 illustrating a relationship between a drive gain and a gas-liquid ratio that can be used to determine a vapor pressure using a vapor pressure meter factor.

FIG. 4 shows a graph 400 illustrating how a static pressure of a fluid in a vibratory meter may be used to determine a vapor pressure.

FIG. 5 shows a system 500 for determining a vapor pressure of a fluid.

FIG. 6 shows a graph 600 illustrating a vapor pressure of a multi-component fluid.

FIG. 7 shows a method 700 for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIGS. 1-7 and the following description depict specific examples to teach those skilled in the art how to make and use the best mode of embodiments of using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure. For the purpose of teaching inventive principles, some conventional aspects have been simplified or omitted. Those skilled in the art will appreciate variations from these examples that fall within the scope of the present description. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the features described below can be combined in various ways to form multiple variations of using the density measurement of the fluid to verify the vapor pressure. As a result, the embodiments described below are not limited to the specific examples described below, but only by the claims and their equivalents.

FIG. 1 shows a vibratory meter 5. As shown in FIG. 1, the vibratory meter 5 comprises a meter assembly 10 and meter electronics 20. The meter assembly 10 responds to mass flow rate and density of a process material. The meter electronics 20 is connected to the meter assembly 10 via leads 100 to provide density, mass flow rate, temperature information over path 26, and/or other information.

The meter assembly 10 includes a pair of manifolds 150 and 150′, flanges 103 and 103′ having flange necks 110 and 110′, a pair of parallel conduits 130 and 130′, driver 180, resistive temperature detector (RTD) 190, and a pair of pickoff sensors 1701 and 170 r. Conduits 130 and 130′ have two essentially straight inlet legs 131, 131′ and outlet legs 134, 134′, which converge towards each other at conduit mounting blocks 120 and 120′. The conduits 130, 130′ bend at two symmetrical locations along their length and are essentially parallel throughout their length. Brace bars 140 and 140′ serve to define the axis W and W′ about which each conduit 130, 130′ oscillates. The legs 131, 131′ and 134, 134′ of the conduits 130, 130′ are fixedly attached to conduit mounting blocks 120 and 120′ and these blocks, in turn, are fixedly attached to manifolds 150 and 150′. This provides a continuous closed material path through meter assembly 10.

When flanges 103 and 103′, having holes 102 and 102′ are connected, via inlet end 104 and outlet end 104′ into a process line (not shown) which carries the process material that is being measured, material enters inlet end 104 of the meter through an orifice 101 in the flange 103 and is conducted through the manifold 150 to the conduit mounting block 120 having a surface 121. Within the manifold 150 the material is divided and routed through the conduits 130, 130′. Upon exiting the conduits 130, 130′, the process material is recombined in a single stream within the mounting block 120′ having a surface 121′ and the manifold 150′ and is thereafter routed to outlet end 104′ connected by the flange 103′ having holes 102′ to the process line (not shown).

The conduits 130, 130′ are selected and appropriately mounted to the conduit mounting blocks 120, 120′ so as to have substantially the same mass distribution, moments of inertia and Young's modulus about bending axes W-W and W′-W′, respectively. These bending axes go through the brace bars 140, 140′. Inasmuch as the Young's modulus of the conduits change with temperature, and this change affects the calculation of flow and density, RTD 190 is mounted to conduit 130′ to continuously measure the temperature of the conduit 130′. The temperature of the conduit 130′ and hence the voltage appearing across the RTD 190 for a given current passing therethrough is governed by the temperature of the material passing through the conduit 130′. The temperature dependent voltage appearing across the RTD 190 is used in a well-known method by the meter electronics 20 to compensate for the change in elastic modulus of the conduits 130, 130′ due to any changes in conduit temperature. The RTD 190 is connected to the meter electronics 20 by lead 195.

Both of the conduits 130, 130′ are driven by driver 180 in opposite directions about their respective bending axes W and W′ and at what is termed the first out-of-phase bending mode of the flow meter. This driver 180 may comprise any one of many well-known arrangements, such as a magnet mounted to the conduit 130′ and an opposing coil mounted to the conduit 130 and through which an alternating current is passed for vibrating both conduits 130, 130′. A suitable drive signal is applied by the meter electronics 20, via lead 185, to the driver 180.

The meter electronics 20 receives the RTD temperature signal on lead 195, and the left and right sensor signals appearing on leads 100 carrying the left and right sensor signals 1651, 165 r, respectively. The meter electronics 20 produces the drive signal appearing on lead 185 to driver 180 and vibrate conduits 130, 130′. The meter electronics 20 processes the left and right sensor signals and the RTD signal to compute the mass flow rate and the density of the material passing through meter assembly 10. This information, along with other information, is applied by meter electronics 20 over path 26 as a signal.

A mass flow rate measurement {dot over (m)} can be generated according to the equation:

$\begin{matrix} {\overset{.}{m} = {{FCF}\left\lbrack {{\Delta\; t} - {\Delta\; t_{0}}} \right\rbrack}} & \lbrack 1\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The Δt term comprises an operationally-derived (i.e., measured) time delay value comprising the time delay existing between the pick-off sensor signals, such as where the time delay is due to Coriolis effects related to mass flow rate through the vibratory meter 5. The measured Δt term ultimately determines the mass flow rate of the flow material as it flows through the vibratory meter 5. The Δt₀ term comprises a time delay at zero flow calibration constant. The Δt₀ term is typically determined at the factory and programmed into the vibratory meter 5. The time delay at zero flow Δt₀ term will not change, even where flow conditions are changing. The flow calibration factor FCF is proportional to the stiffness of the vibratory meter 5.

Pressures in a Fluid in a Vibratory Meter

Assuming an incompressible liquid under steady conditions, the rate at which mass enters a control volume (e.g., a pipe) at an inlet ({dot over (m)}₁) equals the rate at which it leaves at an outlet ({dot over (m)}₃). This principle that the inlet mass flow rate ({dot over (m)}₁) must be equal to the outlet mass flow rate ({dot over (m)}₃) is illustrated by equation [2] below. Moving from the inlet to the outlet, the mass flow rate is conserved at each point along the pipe. However, there may be a reduction in a flow area midway between the inlet and the outlet. This reduction in the flow area requires that the velocity of the fluid increase (ν↑) to maintain the same mass flow rate and obey conservation of mass principles.

$\begin{matrix} {{{\overset{.}{m}}_{1} = {{\rho_{1}v_{1}A_{1}} = {{\rho_{2}v_{2}A_{2}} = {{\overset{.}{m}}_{2} = {\overset{.}{m}}_{3}}}}};} & \lbrack 2\rbrack \end{matrix}$

where:

{dot over (m)} is a mass flow rate of the fluid;

ν is an average fluid velocity;

ρ is a density of the fluid;

A is a total cross-sectional area;

subscript 1 indicates the inlet;

subscript 3 indicates the outlet; and

subscript 2 indicates midway between the inlet and the outlet.

Additionally, the total pressure in a flow system is equal to the sum of both the dynamic pressure and the static pressure:

$\begin{matrix} {P_{total} = {P_{static} + {P_{dynamic}.}}} & \lbrack 3\rbrack \end{matrix}$

The dynamic pressure P_(dynamic) may be defined as:

$\begin{matrix} {{P_{dynamic} = \frac{\rho\; v^{2}}{2}};} & \lbrack 4\rbrack \end{matrix}$

where the terms ρ and ν are defined above with respect to equation [2].

Assuming steady, incompressible, inviscid, irrotational flow, the Bernoulli equation gives:

$\begin{matrix} {{{Constant} = {\frac{\rho\; v^{2}}{2} + {\rho\;{gz}} + P}};} & \lbrack 5\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Where P refers to the static pressure and the ρgz term accounts for hydrostatic head due to elevation changes. More specifically, g is a gravitational constant and z is a height. The viscous portion of pressure drop can be handled with a separate loss term in the Bernoulli equation.

$\begin{matrix} {{{\Delta\; P_{viscous}} = {{- \frac{\rho\; v^{2}}{2}}\frac{fL}{D}}};} & \lbrack 6\rbrack \end{matrix}$

where;

f is a friction factor;

L is a length of a pipe; and

D is a diameter of the pipe.

The below equation [7] is a version of the Bernoulli equation that accounts for frictional losses associated with traveling through a pipe. As fluid travels through the pipe, the fluid dissipates energy and the pressure drops across a given length of pipe. This loss in pressure is unrecoverable because energy from the fluid has been consumed through frictional losses. Accordingly, the following equation may account for this loss:

$\begin{matrix} {{P_{1} + \frac{\rho\; v_{1}^{2}}{2} + {\rho\;{gz}_{1}} + {\Delta\; P_{viscous}}} = {P_{2} + \frac{\rho\; v_{2}^{2}}{2} + {\rho\;{gz}_{2}}}} & \lbrack 7\rbrack \end{matrix}$

This relationship can be applied to the exemplary pipe described above with reference to equation [2]. When the fluid moves from the inlet to midway between the inlet and the outlet, there is a change in velocity to conserve the mass flow rate. Therefore, in maintaining the relationship shown in equation [7], the dynamic pressure

$\frac{\rho\; v^{2}}{2}$

increases, causing the static pressure to decrease. As the fluid moves to the outlet from midway between the inlet and outlet, the static pressure is recovered through the same principles. That is, moving to the outlet from midway between the inlet and the outlet, the flow area is increased; therefore, the fluid velocity is decreased, causing the dynamic pressure to decrease while recovering part of the initial static pressure. However, the static pressure at the outlet will be lower due to unrecoverable viscous losses.

This can cause the static pressures at the inlet and outlet to be greater than a vapor pressure of the fluid, while a static pressure between the inlet and outlet is less than the vapor pressure of the fluid. As a result, although the static pressures at the inlet and the outlet are both greater than the vapor pressure of the fluid, flashing or outgassing may still occur in the pipe. Additionally, a vibratory meter, such as a Coriolis meter, may be inserted into a pipeline that has a diameter that is different than a diameter of a conduit or conduits in the vibratory meter. As a result, when outgas sing is detected in the vibratory meter, the pressure measured in the pipeline may not be a vapor pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter.

Meter Electronics—Drive Gain

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the meter electronics 20 of vibratory meter 5. In operation, the vibratory meter 5 provides various measurement values that may be outputted including one or more of a measured or averaged value of mass flow rate, volume flow rate, individual flow component mass and volume flow rates, and total flow rate, including, for example, both volume and mass flow of individual flow components.

The vibratory meter 5 generates a vibrational response. The vibrational response is received and processed by the meter electronics 20 to generate one or more fluid measurement values. The values can be monitored, recorded, saved, totaled, and/or output. The meter electronics 20 includes an interface 201, a processing system 203 in communication with the interface 201, and a storage system 204 in communication with the processing system 203. Although these components are shown as distinct blocks, it should be understood that the meter electronics 20 can be comprised of various combinations of integrated and/or discrete components.

The interface 201 is configured to communicate with the meter assembly 10 of the vibratory meter 5. The interface 201 may be configured to couple to the leads 100 (see FIG. 1) and exchange signals with the driver 180, pickoff sensors 1701 and 170 r, and RTDs 190, for example. The interface 201 may be further configured to communicate over the communication path 26, such as to external devices.

The processing system 203 can comprise any manner of processing system. The processing system 203 is configured to retrieve and execute stored routines in order to operate the vibratory meter 5. The storage system 204 can store routines including a flowmeter routine 205, a valve control routine 211, a drive gain routine 213, and a vapor pressure routine 215. The storage system 204 can store measurements, received values, working values, and other information. In some embodiments, the storage system stores a mass flow (m) 221, a density (p) 225, a density threshold 226, a viscosity (μ) 223, a temperature (T) 224, a pressure 209, a drive gain 306, a drive gain threshold 302, a gas entrainment threshold 244, a gas entrainment fraction 248, and any other variables known in the art. The routines 205, 211, 213, 215 may comprise any signal noted and those other variables known in the art. Other measurement/processing routines are contemplated and are within the scope of the description and claims.

As can be appreciated, more or fewer values may be stored in the storage system 204. For example, a vapor pressure may be determined without using the viscosity 223. For example, estimate viscosity based on a pressure drop, or a function relating friction as a function of flow rate. However, the viscosity 223 may be used to calculate a Reynolds number which can then be used to determine a friction factor. The Reynolds number and friction factor can be employed to determine a viscous pressure drop in a conduit, such as the conduits 130, 130's described above with reference to FIG. 1. As can be appreciated, the Reynolds number may not necessarily be employed.

The flowmeter routine 205 can produce and store fluid quantifications and flow measurements. These values can comprise substantially instantaneous measurement values or can comprise totalized or accumulated values. For example, the flowmeter routine 205 can generate mass flow measurements and store them in the mass flow 221 storage of the storage system 204, for example. The flowmeter routine 205 can generate density 225 measurements and store them in the density 225 storage, for example. The mass flow 221 and density 225 values are determined from the vibrational response, as previously discussed and as known in the art. The mass flow and other measurements can comprise a substantially instantaneous value, can comprise a sample, can comprise an averaged value over a time interval, or can comprise an accumulated value over a time interval. The time interval may be chosen to correspond to a block of time during which certain fluid conditions are detected, for example a liquid-only fluid state, or alternatively, a fluid state including liquids and entrained gas. In addition, other mass and volume flow and related quantifications are contemplated and are within the scope of the description and claims.

A drive gain threshold 302 may be used to distinguish between periods of flow, no flow, a monophasic/biphasic boundary (where a fluid phase change occurs), and gas entrainment/mixed-phase flow. Similarly, a density threshold 226 applied to the density reading 225 may also be used, separately or together with the drive gain 306, to distinguish gas entrainment/mixed-phase flow. Drive gain 306 may be utilized as a metric for the sensitivity of the vibratory meter's 5 conduit vibration to the presence of fluids of disparate densities, such as liquid and gas phases, for example, without limitation.

As used herein, the term drive gain refers to a measure of the amount of power needed to drive the flow tubes to specified amplitude, although any suitable definition may be employed. For example, the term drive gain may, in some embodiments, refer to drive current, pickoff voltage, or any signal measured or derived that indicates the amount of power needed to drive the flow conduits 130, 130′ at a particular amplitude. The drive gain may be used to detect multi-phase flow by utilizing characteristics of the drive gain, such as, for example, noise levels, standard deviation of signals, damping-related measurements, and any other means known in the art to detect mixed-phase flow. These metrics may be compared across the pick-off sensors 1701 and 170 r to detect a mixed-phase flow.

Detecting a Phase Change of a Fluid

FIG. 3 shows a graph 300 illustrating a relationship between a drive gain and a gas-liquid ratio that can be used to determine a vapor pressure using a vapor pressure meter factor. As shown in FIG. 3, the graph 300 includes an average void fraction axis 310 and a drive gain axis 320. The average void fraction axis 310 and the drive gain axis 320 are incremented in percentages, although any suitable units and/or ratios may be employed.

The graph 300 includes plots 330 that are relationships between drive gains and gas-liquid ratios for various flow rates. As shown, the gas-liquid ratio is an average void fraction value of the plots 330, although any suitable gas-liquid ratio, such as a gas volume fraction (“GVF”) or a gas entrainment fraction, may be employed, and may be based on volume, cross-sectional area, or the like. As can be appreciated, the plots 330 are similar despite being associated with different flow rates. Also shown is a drive gain threshold line 340 that intersects with the plots 330 at about 0.20 percent average void fraction, which may be a reference average void fraction 330 a that corresponds to a 40% drive gain. Also shown is a true vapor pressure drive gain 332, which is about 10%. The true vapor pressure drive gain 332 corresponds to the fluid in the meter assembly that has a static pressure at which a fluid phase change occurs and has a gas-liquid ratio of zero.

As can be seen, the plots 330 vary from a drive gain of about 10 percent to drive gain of about 100 percent over a range of average void fractions from 0.00 percent to about 0.60 percent. As can be appreciated, a relatively small change in the average void fraction results in a significant change in the drive gain. This relatively small change can ensure that the onset of vapor formation can be accurately detected with the drive gain.

Although the drive gain of 40% is shown as corresponding to an average void fraction of 0.20 percent, the correspondence may be specific to a process. For example, the drive gain of 40% may correspond to other average void fractions in other process fluids and conditions. Different fluids may have different vapor pressures and therefore onset of vapor formation for the fluids may occur at different flow rates. That is, a fluid with a relatively low vapor pressure will vaporize at higher flow rates and a fluid with relatively high vapor pressure may vaporize at lower flow rates.

As can also be appreciated, the drive gain threshold line 340 may be at alternative/other drive gains. However, it may be beneficial to have the drive gain at 40% to eliminate false detections of entrainment/mixed phase flow while also ensuring that the onset of vapor formation is correctly detected.

Also, the plots 330 employ a drive gain, but other signals may be used, such as a measured density, or the like. The measured density may increase or decrease due to the presence of voids in the fluid. For example, the measured density may, counterintuitively, increase due to voids in relatively high frequency vibratory meters because of a velocity-of-sound effect. In relatively low frequency meters, the measured density may decrease due to the density of the voids being less than the fluid. These and other signals may be used alone or in combination to detect the presence of the vapor in the meter assembly.

As discussed above, the 0.20 percent average void fraction value may be the reference average void fraction 330 a that corresponds to the 40 percent drive gain value, which may be where the drive gain threshold line 340 intersects with the drive gain axis 320. Accordingly, when a measured drive gain is at 40 percent for a fluid in a meter assembly, such as the meter assembly 10 described above, then an average void fraction of the fluid may be about 0.20 percent. The void fraction of about 0.20 percent may correspond to a pressure of the fluid due to gas present in the fluid. For example, the void fraction of about 0.20 percent may correspond to, for example, a static pressure value.

Due to the previously determined relationship between the drive gain, or other signal, such as density, and the reference average void fraction 330 a, which may be a reference gas-liquid ratio, a vapor pressure may be associated with a vapor pressure meter factor. For example, the meter assembly may be vibrated while a static pressure is increased or decreased until a fluid phase change is detected. A vapor pressure may then be determined from the static pressure, as will be described in more detail in the following with reference to FIG. 4. The determined vapor pressure may correspond to, for example, the static pressure at the drive gain threshold line 340. This determined vapor pressure may be adjusted by the vapor pressure meter factor to correspond to the true vapor pressure drive gain 332, which is where a phase change occurs, or the monophasic/biphasic boundary is encountered. Accordingly, although the presence of gas in the fluid may be detected at a static pressure that is different than the true vapor pressure of the fluid, the true vapor pressure may nevertheless be determined.

Using the reference average void fraction 330 a as an example, the static pressure in the meter assembly may be reduced until the drive gain reaches 40 percent, thereby indicating that the fluid in the meter assembly has an average void fraction of 0.20 percent. A processing system, such as the processing system 203 described above, may determine that the fluid began to vaporize at a static pressure that is, for example, proportionally higher than the static pressure corresponding to the 40 percent drive gain. For example, a true vapor pressure may be associated with a drive gain of about 10%. As can be appreciated, due to uncertainties involved in calculating the static pressure (e.g., errors from a pressure sensor, flow rate measurement errors, etc.) a true vapor pressure may be proportionally lower than the calculated static pressure that is associated with the 40% drive gain. True vapor pressure corresponds to a static pressure of the fluid where a fluid phase change occurs, but the gas-liquid ratio is zero.

Thus, the measured drive gain can be used to detect gas, yet still may result in a highly accurate true vapor pressure. With more particularity, at the instant that outgassing first occurs, with a few tiny bubbles present, drive gain may not increase past the drive gain threshold line 340 for detection. A dynamic pressure may be increased by, for example, a pump that continues to increase a flow rate until the static pressure drops such that drive gain passes the drive gain threshold line 340. Depending on the application, this calculated static pressure (e.g., an uncorrected vapor pressure) could be corrected (e.g., adjusted—decreased or increased) by a vapor pressure meter factor of, for example, 1 psi, to account for the delay in detecting the fluid phase change. That is, the vapor pressure meter factor could be determined and applied to the uncorrected vapor pressure measurement as a function of drive gain to account for the difference in the drive gain at which the gas is detected and the true vapor pressure so as to detect tiny amounts of gas.

Referring to FIG. 3 by way of example, the measured drive gain of 40 percent may correspond to a static pressure of the fluid in the meter assembly that is, for example, 1 psi less than a static pressure corresponding to the drive gain associated with the true vapor pressure. Accordingly, the vibratory meter 5, or meter electronics 20, or any suitable electronics, can determine that the vapor pressure meter factor is 1 psi and add this value to the static pressure associated with the 40 percent drive gain. As a result, the vibratory meter 5 may accurately detect the phase change of the fluid and, therefore, also accurately determine a vapor pressure of the fluid using the drive gain.

However, other means of detecting the phase change may be employed that do not use a drive gain. For example, the phase change may be detected by acoustic measurement, x-ray-based measurements, optical measurements, etc. Also, combinations of the above implementations could be considered. For example, a bypass line that extends vertically in a loop with acoustic and/or optical measurements distributed vertically to determine where the gas first outgasses. This height would then provide the needed input to calculate a vapor pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5, as the following explains.

Pressure Drop in a Vibratory Meter

FIG. 4 shows a graph 400 illustrating how a static pressure of a fluid in a vibratory meter may be used to determine a vapor pressure. As shown in FIG. 4, graph 400 includes a position axis 410 and a static pressure axis 420. The position axis 410 is not shown with any particular units of length, but could be in units of inches, although any suitable unit may be employed. The static pressure axis 420 is in units of pounds-per-square inch (psi), although any suitable unit may be employed. The position axis 410 ranges from an inlet (“IN”) to an outlet (“OUT”) of the vibratory meter.

Accordingly, the position from IN to OUT may correspond to fluid in, for example, the meter assembly 10 shown in FIG. 1. In this example, the region from IN to about A may correspond to a portion of the meter assembly 10 between the flange 103 to the conduit mounting block 120. The region from about A to about G may correspond to the conduits 130, 130′ between the mounting blocks 120, 120′. The region from G to OUT may correspond to the portion of the meter assembly 10 from the mounting block 120′ to the flange 103′. Accordingly, the fluid in the meter assembly 10 (e.g., in the position ranging from IN to OUT) may not include fluid in, for example, the pipeline in which the meter assembly 10 is inserted. The fluid in the meter assembly 10 may be the fluid in the conduits 130, 130′.

The graph 400 also includes a zero dynamic pressure plot 430 and a dynamic pressure change plot 440. The zero dynamic pressure plot 430 shows no change in the dynamic pressure—the pressure is assumed to decrease linearly from an inlet to an outlet of a vibratory meter. The dynamic pressure change plot 440 may represent an actual pressure in the vibratory meter inserted into the pipeline wherein the diameter of the conduit or conduits of the vibratory meter is less than the diameter of the pipeline. An exemplary vibratory meter 5 is shown in FIG. 1, although any suitable vibratory meter may be employed. Accordingly, the fluid in the meter assembly, such as the meter assembly 10 described above, may have a reduced static pressure due to an increase in dynamic pressure. Also shown is a vapor pressure line 450 representing a vapor pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter.

The dynamic pressure change plot 440 includes a static pressure drop section 440 a, a viscous loss section 440 b, and a static pressure increase section 440 c. The dynamic pressure change plot 440 also includes a minimum static pressure 440 d. The static pressure drop section 440 a may be due to an increase in fluid velocity causing a corresponding increase in the dynamic pressure of this section of the vibratory meter. The viscous loss section 440 b may correspond to a constant diameter portion of the conduit or conduits in the vibratory meter. Accordingly, the viscous loss section 440 b may not reflect an increase in fluid velocity and, therefore, may not reflect an increase in a dynamic pressure. The static pressure increase section 440 c may be due to a decrease in fluid velocity and, therefore, the static pressure decrease during the static pressure drop section 440 a may be recovered. The static pressure drop section 440 a and the static pressure increase section 440 c may be static pressure changes in the meter assembly.

The portion of the dynamic pressure change plot 440 lying below the vapor pressure line 450, which includes the minimum static pressure 440 d, may correspond to positions (e.g., from about position E to slightly after position G) where a fluid phase change occurs in a fluid in a meter assembly, such as the meter assembly 10 described above. As can be seen in FIG. 4, the minimum static pressure 440 d is below the vapor pressure line 450. This indicates that the dynamic pressure change plot 440 may be shifted upwards by increasing the static pressure of the fluid in the meter assembly. However, if the static pressure were to be increased by about 5 psi so as to shift the dynamic pressure change plot 440 up until the minimum static pressure 440 d lies on the vapor pressure line 450, a fluid phase change may be detected. Because the static pressure is increased, gas or vapor in the fluid in the meter assembly may become a liquid. Conversely, if the dynamic pressure change plot 440 were above the vapor pressure line 450 and the static pressure of the fluid in the meter assembly were decreased until the minimum static pressure 440 d lies on the vapor pressure line, then the fluid phase change may be the formation of gas or vapor in the fluid.

As can be seen in FIG. 4, the viscous loss section 440 b decreases from a static pressure of about 68 psi at position A to a static pressure of about 55 psi at position G. As can be appreciated, the static pressure of about 55 psi at the position G is less than the vapor pressure line 450, which is about 58 psi. As a result, even though the static pressures at the inlet and outlet are greater than the vapor pressure line 450, the fluid in the vibratory meter may still flash or outgas.

Accordingly, the static pressure at the inlet and outlet do not directly correspond to the vapor pressure of the fluid. In other words, the vapor pressure of the fluid may not be directly determined from a static pressure of the fluid in the pipeline or external of the meter assembly. The static pressure in the meter assembly 10 or, more specifically, the conduits 130, 130′, can be accurately determined by, for example, using the pressure measurements at the inlet and the outlet and inputting the dimensions of the vibratory meter 5 (e.g., diameter and length of the conduit 130, 130′). However, to accurately determine the vapor pressure, a phase change in the fluid in the vibratory meter 5 may need to be induced, which may be caused by varying the static pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5.

Varying a Static Pressure of a Fluid

FIG. 5 shows a system 500 for determining a vapor pressure of a fluid. As shown in FIG. 5, the system 500 is a bypass that includes a bypass inlet and a bypass outlet that are coupled to a pipeline 501. The system 500 includes a pump 510 in fluid communication with an outlet of a vibratory meter 5, illustrated as a Coriolis meter, and the bypass outlet. An inlet pressure sensor 520 is in fluid communication with an inlet of the vibratory meter 5 and the bypass inlet. An outlet pressure sensor 530 is disposed between the outlet of the vibratory meter 5 and the pump 510 and is in configured to measure a static pressure of the fluid at the outlet of the vibratory meter 5. A flow control device 540, which is shown as a valve, is disposed between the bypass inlet and the inlet pressure sensor 520.

The pump 510 may be any suitable pump that can, for example, increase a velocity of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5. The pump 510 may, for example, include a variable frequency drive. The variable frequency drive may allow the pump 510 to control a fluid velocity of the fluid in the system 500. For example, the variable frequency drive may increase the fluid velocity of the fluid through the vibratory meter 5, although the fluid velocity may be increased by any suitable pump. By increasing the fluid velocity, the pump 510 can increase a dynamic pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5 by increasing the fluid velocity.

Accordingly, the static pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5 may decrease. By way of illustration, with reference to FIG. 4, the pump 510 may cause the dynamic pressure change plot 440 to shift downward. Accordingly, although not shown in FIG. 4, should the dynamic pressure change plot 440 be above the vapor pressure line 450, the pump 510 may induce flashing or outgassing by causing the dynamic pressure change plot 440 to shift downward. Similarly, by shifting the dynamic pressure change plot 440 up to or above the vapor pressure line 450, gas or vapor in the fluid may become a liquid.

The inlet pressure sensor 520 and the outlet pressure sensor 530 may be any suitable pressure sensor configured to measure any pressure of the fluid. For example, the inlet pressure sensor 520 and the outlet pressure sensor 530 may measure a static pressure of the fluid in the system 500. Additionally, or alternatively, the inlet pressure sensor 520 and the outlet pressure sensor 530 may measure a total pressure of the fluid in the system 500. In one example, a dynamic pressure of the fluid may be determined by taking a difference between the total pressure and the static pressure of the fluid in the system 500 according to equation [3] above. For example, the inlet pressure sensor 520 may measure the total pressure and the static pressure of the fluid proximate to, or at, an inlet of the vibratory meter 5. The inlet pressure sensor 520 and/or the meter electronics 20 in the vibratory meter 5 may determine the dynamic pressure at the inlet of the vibratory meter 5.

The flow control device 540 may increase the fluid velocity of the fluid in the system 500, when the flow control device 540's position is moved from a partially closed position to a fully open position. For example, by decreasing the flow restriction of the system 500 at the inlet of the vibratory meter 5, the velocity of the fluid may increase in accordance with equation [2] above. This can shift the dynamic pressure change plot 440 down so as to induce flashing or outgassing. Conversely, the flow control device 540 can reduce the fluid velocity of the fluid in the system 500 thereby shifting the dynamic pressure change plot 440 up, thereby causing gas or vapors to condense.

As the flow control device 540 is opened, the fluid velocity will increase, but so will a static pressure at the vibratory meter 5 inlet, and vice versa. The combination of the flow control device 540 with the pump 510 may provide a preferred process condition by partially closing the flow control device 540 (e.g., to restrict a flow and lower pressure downstream of the flow control device 540) and increasing pump speed (e.g., increasing flow rate) to obtain a desirably lower static pressure and higher velocity.

Although the static pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5, or, more particularly, the meter assembly 10 in the vibratory meter 5, may be varied by using the pump 510 or the flow control device 540, or a combination of both, described above, other means of varying the static pressure may be employed. For example, a height z of the vibratory meter 5 may be varied. To reduce the static pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5, the height z may be increased. To increase the static pressure of the fluid in the vibratory meter 5, the height z may be decreased. The height z of the vibratory meter 5 may be varied by any suitable means, such as a motorized lift between the vibratory meter 5 and the pipeline 501 and bellows between the vibratory meter 5, for example, the flow control device 540 and the pump 510. Other means may be employed, as well as a combination of various means (e.g., the pump 510, flow control device 540, and/or the motorized lift).

For example, if the flow rate through a bypass is sufficient, a pump may not necessarily be employed. Only the flow control device 540 may be used. The flow control device 540 may be installed in other locations, such as downstream of the vibratory meter 5. Alternatively, the flow control device 540 may not be employed, such as where the pump 510 and/or motorized lift is used. In another alternative example, the meter may be installed in the main line, rather than a bypass. Additionally, or alternatively, only a single pressure sensor may be employed. For example, only the outlet pressure sensor 530 may be employed. The inlet and/or outlet pressure sensors 520, 530 may be located at alternative locations. The outlet pressure sensor 530 and its location may be beneficial because the static pressure at the location of the outlet pressure sensor 530 may substantially stabilize with respect to fluid velocity once the fluid in the meter assembly 10 is at the vapor pressure. That is, any additional increase in the fluid velocity may not cause a substantial decrease in the static pressure measured by the outlet pressure sensor 530.

Using Density to Determine a Vapor Pressure

FIG. 6 shows a graph 600 illustrating a vapor pressure of a multi-component fluid. As shown in FIG. 6, the multi-component fluid is comprised of hydrocarbons. The graph 600 includes a liquid density axis 610 and a logarithmic vapor pressure axis 620, which are respectively in units of kilograms-per-cubic meter (kg/m³) and pounds-per-square inch absolute (psia), although any suitable unit may be employed. The graph 600 also includes a density-to-pressure plot 630 illustrating a relationship between the density and vapor pressure of hydrocarbons. The density-to-pressure plot 630 is shown as being comprised of a propane density-to-pressure plot 630 a, a butane density-to-pressure plot 630 b, and a hexane density-to-pressure plot 630 c. The temperature of the multi-component fluid lies in a range of 34° C. to 48° C.

When the fluid in the meter assembly is comprised of two components, such as, for example, propane and butane, the density of the fluid may lie between the density of the two components. This density can be used to determine a vapor pressure for the mixture. For example, the density of the propane and butane fluid can be correlated with the vapor pressure by interpolation. In one example, a linear interpolation may be used to estimate the vapor pressure of the mixture from the density. By way of example, the multi-component fluid comprised of propane and butane may have a density of about 500 kg/m³, which may correspond to a vapor pressure of about 130 psia. This vapor pressure can be used to verify a vapor pressure determined by detecting a phase change in a meter assembly as described above.

It can be appreciated that FIG. 6 may be a simplified representation with only three components. Alternative density-to-temperature plots may differ. For example, more components typical of a crude oil or processed hydrocarbon and the characteristics may be employed, which may result in alternative density-to-temperature plots. By way of illustration, and not limitation, if additional propane(s) are employed, an increase in a vapor pressure may be observed, but the density may be similar if the other components are heavier (e.g., crude oil). Regardless, a general relationship may remain true that, for example, the higher the density the lower the vapor pressure and vice versa. Additionally, a slope or curve of the alternative plot may not always be constant. Once a calibration is performed in, for example, a specific application where the fluid composition may not significantly vary then a calibrated vapor pressure vs density plot may be obtained that can be employed, as the following illustrates.

FIG. 7 shows a method 700 for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure. As shown in FIG. 7, the method 700 determines a vapor pressure of a fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in the meter assembly in step 710. The meter assembly employed by the method 700 may be the meter assembly 10 described above, although any suitable meter assembly may be employed. In step 720, the method 700 measures a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly. The density of the fluid, such as a multi-component fluid, may be determined by, for example, determining a resonant frequency of the meter assembly and determining a corresponding density associated with the resonant frequency. The method 700, in step 730, derives a vapor pressure from the measured density. In step 740, the method 700 compares the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.

In step 710, the vapor pressure of the fluid may be determined by, for example, varying the total or static pressure of the fluid in the meter assembly 10 until a fluid phase change is detected. For example, the static pressure of the fluid may be decreased until vapor is no longer detected. Conversely, the static pressure may be increased until vapor is detected. The fluid phase change may be detected by any suitable means, such as, for example, based on the sensor signals, such as detecting a change in a drive gain or drive signal as discussed above with reference to FIG. 3.

When the fluid phase change is detected, such as when a change in the drive gain is detected, the vibratory meter 5, or electronics coupled to the vibratory meter 5, may determine the pressure at the inlet and/or outlet of the meter assembly 10. For example, with reference to FIG. 5, the inlet pressure sensor 520 may measure the static pressure of the fluid at the inlet of the meter assembly 10 and the outlet pressure sensor 530 may measure the static pressure of the fluid at the outlet of the meter assembly 10. Accordingly, the inlet static pressure and/or the outlet static pressure may be associated with the fluid phase change.

The inlet static pressure and the outlet static pressure can be used in equation [7] above to determine a static pressure in the meter assembly. For example, the outlet pressure may be P₁, and P₂ may be a pressure of the fluid in the meter assembly. The height related terms, ρgz₁ and ρgz₂ may be used to account for change in height of the fluid in the meter assembly due to, for example, conduit geometry. For example, bow shaped conduits, such as those of the meter assembly 10 described above, may have an elevation change. The dynamic velocity terms

$\frac{\rho\; v_{1}^{2}}{2},\frac{\rho\; v_{2}^{2}}{2}$

may similarly be solved for by measuring a density and a flow rate of the fluid and knowing the dimensions of the conduits and the pipe coupled to the conduits' inlets and outlets. Similarly, the viscous pressure drop term,

${{- \frac{\rho\; v^{2}}{2}}\frac{fL}{D}},$

may also be determined.

In step 730, the derivation of the vapor pressure may be based on previously determined correlations between a plurality of vapor pressures and densities. For example, with reference to FIG. 6, the plurality of vapor pressures may include vapor pressure measurements of various hydrocarbons. The densities may be the densities of the hydrocarbons. Although FIG. 6 shows hydrocarbons of propane, butane, and hexane, more or fewer and alternative hydrocarbons may be employed.

The correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the densities may be the density-to-pressure plot 630, which, as illustrated in FIG. 6, is comprised of a propane density-to-pressure plot 630 a, a butane density-to-pressure plot 630 b, and a hexane density-to-pressure plot 630 c. The correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the densities may also include interpolations, such as formulas, data points, or the like, between the propane density-to-pressure plot 630 a, butane density-to-pressure plot 630 b, and/or hexane density-to-pressure plot 630 c.

These interpolations may correspond to correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the densities for multi-component fluids. For example, referring to FIG. 6, an interpolation between the propane density-to-pressure plot 630 a and the butane density-to-pressure plot 630 b may correlate a density of 500 kg/m³ to a vapor pressure of about 120 psia. This interpolation may correlate densities and vapor pressures for a mixture of propane and butane. As discussed above, density-to-pressure plots alternative to those shown in FIG. 6 may differ depending on the number and concentration of components.

Therefore, since the vapor pressure of a liquid is a function of temperature and composition, and the density of a liquid is a strong function of temperature and composition, the vapor pressure of a pure or multi-component liquid can be correlated to its density. This is shown on FIG. 6, where the vapor pressure of selected hydrocarbons is plotted against their liquid density. The density and temperature measurements from a Coriolis meter could be used to determine the approximate saturation pressure of a hydrocarbon. This correlation can be used as an indirect measure of the vapor pressure and would be used as a quality check for the direct pressure measurements described above with reference to FIGS. 3-5. Because density and temperature is measured, and because standard hydrocarbons exhibit a consistent relationship between vapor pressure and those variables, an approximate indication of vapor pressure for any hydrocarbon could be provided in any installation, just by measuring density, without the need for bypass line, pump, valves, pressure measurement, or other components. However, depending on whether the individual components change during flow, additional information may need to be known and therefore additional components may need to be employed.

Additionally, a calibration service that fits a specific application, fluid(s), and process conditions could be offered. During the calibration, the density (of pure or multi-component liquids) could be correlated to the vapor pressure, potentially eliminating the need of taking pressure measurements. Typical composition of hydrocarbon liquids from midstream plants contain a mixture of around 30 components. Using only density to determine the vapor pressure of the mixture having 30 components may be sufficiently accurate. For example, the vapor pressure may be sufficiently accurate if the expected change in concentration of each component is minimal.

The above describes the vibratory meter 5, in particular the meter electronics 20, and a method 700 of using density to verify a vapor pressure. Accordingly, the accuracy of the vapor pressure may be assured. The density may include densities of multi-component fluid. Therefore, when the vapor pressure is comprised of a plurality of partial vapor pressures, the densities may still be used to verify the vapor pressure. In addition, because the density may be determined in a vibratory meter 5, which may also determine the vapor pressure, the vapor pressure may be verified within, for example, the meter electronics 20, prior to providing the vapor pressure over path 26.

The detailed descriptions of the above embodiments are not exhaustive descriptions of all embodiments contemplated by the inventors to be within the scope of the present description. Indeed, persons skilled in the art will recognize that certain elements of the above-described embodiments may variously be combined or eliminated to create further embodiments, and such further embodiments fall within the scope and teachings of the present description. It will also be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the above-described embodiments may be combined in whole or in part to create additional embodiments within the scope and teachings of the present description.

Thus, although specific embodiments are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the present description, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. The teachings provided herein can be applied to other ways of using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure and not just to the embodiments described above and shown in the accompanying figures. Accordingly, the scope of the embodiments described above should be determined from the following claims. 

We claim:
 1. A meter electronics (20) for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure, the meter electronics (20) comprising: a processing system (200) communicatively coupled to a meter assembly (10) having the fluid, the processing system (200) being configured to: determine a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in the meter assembly (10); measure a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly (10); derive a vapor pressure from the measured density; and compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.
 2. The meter electronics (20) of claim 1, wherein the fluid is a multi-component fluid comprised of hydrocarbon components.
 3. The meter electronics (20) of claim 2, wherein the hydrocarbon components are comprised of at least two of propane, butane, and hexane.
 4. The meter electronics (20) of claim 1, wherein the processing system (200) being configured to derive the vapor pressure from the measured density comprises the processing system (200) being configured to utilize previously determined correlations between a plurality of vapor pressures and a plurality of densities.
 5. The meter electronics (20) of claim 4, wherein the processing system (200) being configured to utilize previously the determined correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the plurality of the densities comprises the processing system (200) being configured to interpolate between the previously determined correlations.
 6. The meter electronics (20) of claim 1, wherein the processing system (200) being configured to compare the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure comprises the processing system (200) being configured to determine if the determined vapor pressure is within a predetermined range of the derived vapor pressure.
 7. The meter electronics (20) of claim 1, wherein the processing system (200) is further configured to determine the vapor pressure using a drive gain.
 8. A method for using a density measurement of a fluid to verify a vapor pressure, the method comprising: determining a vapor pressure of the fluid by detecting a phase change of the fluid in a meter assembly; measuring a density of the fluid based on a resonant frequency of the meter assembly; deriving a vapor pressure from the measured density; and comparing the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the fluid is a multi-component fluid comprised of hydrocarbon components.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the hydrocarbon components are comprised of at least two of propane, butane, and hexane.
 11. The method of claim 8, wherein deriving the vapor pressure from the measured density comprises utilizing previously determined correlations between a plurality of vapor pressures and a plurality of densities.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein utilizing previously the determined correlations between the plurality of vapor pressures and the plurality of the densities comprises interpolating between the previously determined correlations.
 13. The method of claim 8, wherein comparing the determined vapor pressure with the derived vapor pressure comprises determining if the determined vapor pressure is within a predetermined range of the derived vapor pressure.
 14. The method of claim 8, further comprising determining the vapor pressure using a drive gain. 